A review of workers struggles
in Iran in the Iranian year 1380
(March 2001-March 2002)
Translated by
Workers Left
Unity- Iran
*Based on an article by Youssef Abkhoun and Sohrab
Yekta- activists of WLU
This article tries to review the struggles of Iranian workesr in
the year 1380. In this respect we will use statistics to present
an overall picture of the workers movement in Iran and to answer
some of the questions regarding forms and conditions of workers
struggles in various sectors.
In the final section we have tried to present the most
important conclusions one can deduce from this review.
According to these figures , the number of workers protest
during this year was 306, signifying a major increase in
comparison with previous years. one reason for this increase is
the fact that other sectors of workers and wage earners such
as teachers and nurses have joined industrial workers. Protests
by teachers and nurses, has had qualitative as well as
quantitative influence on the workers movement. It should be
added that this figure (like previous years) refers to protests
in major factories and industries and refers to those struggles
that have been reported by the media. Therefore it does not
reflect protests and struggles by workers in small and medium
size production or service workshops where the majority of
Iranian workers are employed and that these struggles are never
covered . Given this shortcoming unfortunately , one cannot talk
of a comprehensive analysis encompassing the entire working
population, especially as we know that 96% of the country’s
workforce are employed in small workshops of 10 or fewer than
10 employees .
Demands
The first and most important demand of Iranian workers in the
year 1380( March 2001-March 2002) was as in the previous year,
the demand for payment of unpaid wages and bonuses, some of
which has not been paid for over 2 years.
After the demand for unpaid wages, protests against job losses
and the demand for jobs and job security featured high amongst
the workers main demands. As you can see from table 4, the
demand for a return to work and job security, keeping a factory
open constituted about 84 cases of workers protests.
The third most common demand , during this year was for pay
increases. In the two previous Iranian years (March 1999-March
2001) given the severity of the economic crisis, recession and
closure of factories as well as doubts about the general issue
of workers employment in major factories, there was no room for
demanding pay rises. However last year, as teachers and nurses
joined workers protests, the demand for better wages featured in
39 cases of workers protests.
Following the above demands, there were protests at
privatisation plans(1 case) , demands for implantation of job
classification (8 cases), protests at legislation passed as
'reconstruction of the textile industries' (legislation that
gave a free hand to managers and employers to sack workers in
textile factories, claiming bankruptcy, and sacking surplus
workers) . This legislation was passed by the Majles(Islamic
Parliament) half way through the year and with its passage the
role of shora eslami (government set up workers organisations)
in factories was further reduced.
The demand for implementation of early retirement in difficult
jobs accounted for 4 cases of protest. Opposition to the
transfer of social security hospitals ( built with payments by
workers contributions) to the Ministry of Health) caused 2
further protests.
In categorising workers demands, it should be noted that this is
based on the number of instances where the same demands are put
forward. It should be noted that
1-the demand for pay rises at times includes the demand for
better bonuses and conditions and they have been classified in
one category
2-Calls for improved working conditions and reduction in working
hours is considerably less than previous years or not mentioned
at all.
In addition to the categories listed above a number of other
issues caused workers protests a total of 46 cases categorised
as other demands. The teachers demand for the setting up of a representative
organisation, was limited to them and was therefore classified
with 'Other demands'
The main forms of workers protest in the Iranian
year 1380 ( March 2001-March 2002)
According to the
statistics, the principal indicator of workers struggles in 1380
shows a major difference with previous years and that is the
prevalence of protest beyond the factory gate ( strike , sit in,
go slow) . According to these figures the highest number of
workers protests took place in the form of gatherings in front
of production units, offices, government organisations ... ( 113
cases) . In order to show a more accurate picture of workers
struggles , type of protests that are similar have been
categorised. The other point to emphsiase are gatherings of
workers outside the Majles ( Islamic Parliament) - Although
this form of protest existed before, the number of instances of
workers demonstrating outside the Majles was much higher this
year compared to previous years. We can therefore say that 189
of the 319 protests , involved protests
outside/beyond the factory gate.
In the year 80 ( March 2001-2002) , the third most common from
of workers protest was strikes(44cases).
The increase in the number of strikes, compared to figures from
the 2 previous years is partly due to teachers participation in
the movement and nationwide strike and closure caused by their
strike during working days.
Regarding the participation of service sector employees in the
workers protests , although the numbers of such protests are not
high, their influence on the movement is considerable. In
addition, the teachers and nurses' protests which took the form
of nationwide hour strikes, was significant. Protests in this
sector increased the total share of protests demanding better
wages as opposed to protests against unpaid wages and bonuses,
it also increased the number of strikes.
Workers movement in various sectors
In a review of the workers protests for this year it is
important to note the diversity of the industries where
the protests took place. Protests in the textile sector was 99
cases, high as in previous years , due to fact that this sector
has the highest number of factories facing bankruptcy and
workers in this industry faced unemployment and sackings, then
the employees of the ministry of education and teachers who
with 39 protests had the second highest number of protests while
last year they had no protests.
Distribution of workers movements according to
provinces.
The statistics from the protests of last year show that the
highest number of protests took place in Tehran and Karaj
provinces, a vast area from Hasht guard and Nazarabad to Saveh
road, a total of 76 cases. In second place was Isfahan province
, due to the concentration of the textile industry and there
were 73 cases of workers protests in this province alone, 55
protests in or near the town of Isfahan and 14 in Kashan.
According to the statistics of Iran's Ministry of Industries,
there are currently 4785 textile production units in Iran with
Isfahan province having the largest number of units , 1164,
Azerbaijan 722, Tehran 656 and Yazd 351 units. The textile
industry employs 483 thousand workers , i.e. 1.10 of the worker
force employed in the country's 10 main industrial sectors. Thus
, one can say that after oil , textile industries are amongst
the most important industrial sectors of Iran.
Results of workers struggles of 1380
The result of 257 workers protest are unclear , 28 protests lead
to confrontation with the security forces and the police,
causing injury and arrest for the workers, this number was much
higher than previous years. In 12 cases promises were not kept
and in at least 4 cases protest lead to sacking of protesting
workers. In all this only 5 cases lead to relative victory for
workers and some of their demands were met. In this respect one
can say that most of the workers protests of the year 80 were
defeated or workers failed to achieve their demands. This fact
is obvious from repeated protests for the same demands and
constant struggle by workers.
The most important workers issues of the year
By analysing the most important indicators of workers protests ,
we can point out the important issues regarding workers
struggles during this year:
1-Attempts by the government to change the Labour legislation,.
Despite the workers worsening situation , the government
followed this policy with the aim of adavncing the so called
'economic reconstruction and privatisation' -During the last 2
years, following the exemption of workshops of 5 employees or
less from the Labour legislation, the approval of the
legislation exempting carpet weaving workers form this
legislation and social security , as well the legislation about
'reconstructing the textile industry' , the government has made
its own labour legislation , irrelevant. and meaningless.
A legislation that had already lost its meaning with workers
loosing job security, facing mass redundancy as well as the
issue of payment of wages being under question in many major
industries ( i.e. workers who were supposed to be covered by
this legislation).
2-A change in the strategy of Khaneh Kargar ( a government set
up workers organisation). A new strategy for this organisation
as the guiding and leading force of Islamic shoras and Anjomans
( government set up workers organisations) which started in the
last 2/3 years and was clarified last year, attempting to
present itself as a trade union independent of the government .
And of course it operated, as it had done in the past , not as a
genuine trade union or an independent workers union, but as an
organisation, which had the monopoly of legal recognition. This
strategy is a result of conditions where Khaneh Kargar, Islamic
shoras and all other government set up workers organisations
were isolated and hated by the workers and were considered not
only as ideological organisations dependent on the state, but
as direct means of repression in service of the state.
The strategy of Khaneh Kargar , with all its obedience to the
regime , while denying the right of setting up similar
organisations for others, was in fact an attempt at
strengthening their own positions and monopoly of power , while
using a new name and title. A name that could reduce the
pressures and sensibilities of the World Back and the IMF,
cancelling the effect of Islamic shoras and convincing these
organisations that it will be able to control workers protests
while advancing neo liberal policies while at the same time
pacifying workers demands for setting up truly independent
organisations that might challenge these policies.
4-Participation of various sectors of the working class in the
protests of 1380 was important and distinguished this year from
previous years. The participation of teachers and nurses , was ,
as mentioned before a significant step forward qualitatively
and quantitatively . Protesting for wages in line with
inflation, the right to set up genuine independent workers
organisations, nationwide strikes and the subsequent support
were also demands, which had not been made so clearly in
previous years, all giving special significance to the workers
movement in 1380.
5-Rise in workers solidarity was also a characteristic of this
year's struggle. The spread of protest in support of other
workers was higher than previous years , as an example one can
mention the widespread support and solidarity with workers from
Baresh factory in Isfahan, which were reported..
5-1st of May demonstrations this year when for the first time,
workers managed to organise their own demonstration,boycotting
the government 'celebrations'’. For the first time, few workers
attended the government ceremony and in Isfahan workers tried to
disrupt the state ceremonies. In Kurdish cites, May Day was
celebrated by workers independent of the state.
In summary it can be said that the workers movement of 1380,
despite the significant steps it took that year , with major
nationwide strikes, struggles in support of other workers and
putting forward the demand for independent workers
organisations,did not succeed in presenting itself as an
organised united class movemnet . No doubt the economic crisis,
bankruptcy and destruction in the economic structure, general
recession created conditions against workers. Especially as the
material conditions of the most organised sections of the
working class s, i.e. those working in major industries, is
crumbling and there is no perspective of saving the country’s
economy or industry.
These conditions enhance other obstacle against the nationwide
organisation of the working class: a majority of the workforce
are employed in workshops of 5 or less employees. A small
proportion of the workforce works in major industries. Workers
in small workshop constitute 90% of the workforce and the number
of the unemployed exceeds the employed.
But these same conditions
have increased the workers dissatisfaction , as they are
deprived of the right to work or live , this has increased their
solidarity and strengthened d their struggle. A struggle not
only for the payment of their eagles, and for jobs but for the
right to live and civil rights, A right that cannot be achieved
without major changes in the country’s economic and political
situation.
Table 1
List of the most important workers demands
between March2001-March 2002
Categorised in numbers and percentage
Demands
Numbers Percentage |
1 Payment of delayed wages
178 45.8 |
/bonuses |
2 Increase in wages or
benefits 39 10 |
3 Return to work, protest
at 37 9.5 |
unemployment |
4 keeping the factory
open 36 9.3 |
5 job
security
11 2.8 |
6 protest at
privatisation
11 2.8 |
7 implementation of
job 9 2.3 |
Classification |
8 protest at
legislation
8 2.1 |
for textile industry |
9 early retirement for
difficult 4
1 |
jobs |
10 permanent
employment 4
1 |
11 protest at transfer of
hospital 3 .8 |
to the ministry of health |
12 payment of unemployment insurance 3
.8 |
13
others
46 11.8 |
total
389 100 |
|
Table 2
Various Forms of workers struggles
Form of protest
Numbers Percentage
|
1-Gathering outside the factory
113 35.4 |
government offices |
2-Sit in and gatherings
45 14.1 |
inside the factory |
3-strike
44 13.8 |
4-closing main streets and
37 11.6 |
highways |
5-march and demonstration
24 7.5 |
6-gathering outside Majles
15 4.7 |
(outside parliament) |
7-hunger
strike
2 0.6 |
8-writing letters
petitions
39 12.2 |
|
Total 319
|
Table 3
Distribution of workers protests in various
sectors in numbers and percentage
Sector
Numbers Percentage |
1- textile
99 33.4 |
2-
education
39 1 3.2 |
3-shoe making
17
5.7 |
4-Metal and Car industry
13 4.4 |
5-clothing manufacturer
12 4.1 |
6-hospitals and health clinics
11 3.7 |
7-Oil,gaz, petrochemical
10 3.4 |
8-mines
9
3 |
9-
carpet
6 2 |
10-transport
6 2 |
11-other
sectors
74 25
|
total 296
|
|
|
|
|
|
Table 4
Distribution of workers protests according to provinces
Province
Numbers Percentage |
1- Tehran and
Karaj
78 25.1 |
2- Isfahan
73
24.1 |
3- Azarbaijan east and
west
20 6,6 |
4-
Khouzestan
18 5.9 |
5-
Mazandaran
16 5.3 |
6-
Kermanshah
13 4.3 |
7-
Fars
11 3.6 |
8-
Guilan
9 3 |
9-
Kerman
9 3 |
10-
Lorestan
7 2.3 |
11- Hamedan
6
1.9 |
12-
Ilam
6 1.9 |
13-
Yazd
5
1.7 |
14- other
provinces
34 11.2 |
|
total
303 |
|
Table 5 –
Consequences of workers protests March 2002-March
2003
Consequence
Number
|
Unclear
257 |
Confrontation with military and
counter 28 |
Insurgence forces |
Promise to deal with
demands 12 |
Victory for
workers
5 |
Threat and expulsion of
workers 4 |
Total
306 |
|